As always there’s problems when Inter has to sell and Sky reports that Montoya, who hasn’t been playing a lot at all, has decided to stay at Inter and not to leave for Germany where there was interest for him. By the players who are on their way out it only seems to be Ranocchia who is convinced to leave and as of today, the most probable destination is Bologna. This would mean a problem for Ausilio who wouldn’t be sure to get the money Inter would need to make January signings.
Follow me on Twitter:
Follow @SiavoushF
horrible defener
A few days ago new McLaren F1 subsequent after earning 18,512$,,,this was my previous month’s paycheck ,and-a little over, 17k$ Last month ..3-5 h/r of work a day ..with extra open doors & weekly paychecks.. it’s realy the easiest work I have ever Do.. I Joined This 7 months ago and now making over 87$, p/h.Learn More right Here
bv…
➤➤
➤➤➤ http://GlobalSuperEmploymentVacanciesReportsOnline/GetPaid/98$hourly…❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦.❦
Montoya in Inter is Loan or what? What money that Ausillio mean if Montoya is only Loan?
Montoya is a loan with mandatory purchase for over 25 appearance for the club on official games. Now thats not going to happen so we don’t have to pay the money for him in June. The problem is that if he is staying then we can’t buy a new right back. And if we do buy new right back then we still have to pay Montoya salary, and the D`Ambrosio, Santon, playing or not playing.
D’ambrosio should be sold along with Dodo, Vidic and nagatomo. The only defenders we should have are: Santon, Murillo, Miranda, Montoya, Alex Telles and Juan Jesus
What’s wrong with keeping Montoya and playing him; we aren’t obliged to buy him but if he develops well we still have the option. If not we send him back and buy a new right back. One who we use the next 6 months to identify
Maybe we must playing him and judge him until June. as long we play him not more than 25 games is okay right?