In his editorial on calciomercato.it, Sky Sport’s transfer market Alessandro Sugoni focused on the transfer market for the big teams and thus focus on Inter: “Inter for example, has already done a lot in this transfer market. Almost everything. Missing a last arrival. Because Mazzarri is expecting something else upfront. Biabiany is the player who would (have) the ideal profile. Flexible, proven, and also (fairly) cheap. If he doesn’t end up first in England, the signing at the end of the transfer market could be him. Unless… Unless some sales arrive (Guarin?) to bring fresh money. The chapter on Juventus transfer market: a sale – in this case Vidal – could also take off during the last 15 days for the black and white club. It would lead Allegri to Manolas, Guarin and maybe Chicharito Hernandez that Van Gaal seems to not to want anymore.”
Source: fcinternews.it
Every player will never be good under mazari!!!! SACK HIM!
If Cerci is not really available then I’m ok with this guy
maybe as rwb
kuzmanovic ideal for mazzari
yes, he is ideal for our mediocre team
if we don’t have the money Thohir, just say it, and give a chance to ANY of our youngsters instead of this guy
Thohir said it a million times “we have to sell before we buy speech”. It does not matter if he has 10000000 billion euros, Because it’s not his wealth that matters.He is inters president he can only use the revenue inter makes as a club ( not his pocket money) and this is according to the financial fair play rule. The money he can spend on the transfer market is through shirt sales, tv broadcasting rights, match day revenue (tickets from matches), player sales, lowering wadges, sponsorships..etc
Again I’m repeating he is NOT ALLOWED TO SPEND FROM HIS OWN MONEY.
I wonder if thohir should replace PIRELLI with his company like astra, he can inject 40 M/year for sponsorship with 10 years contract….
Wow how rich we are
Or with with the money use to buy a star player every year:D
that is what i meant with “if we don’t have the money”…
–
btw, PSG, City, Chelsea or Monaco didn’t start with low profile singings for basicly no money, their owners injected lots and lots of money to achieve something (well, Monaco is a newcomer…) hence the FFP… this is a very nice cover, but in reality you have to spend to leave a mark
You can’t compare Italian clubs like Inter and AC Milan with PSG, City, Chelsea or Monaco. First of all the economy in Italy is really bad which also affects the football clubs, less people going to see the matches etc. There’s also the situation with the arena. Inter and AC Milan don’t own San Siro and therefore they miss out on a lot of money on gamedays. Inter and Milan have also been known to be two of the clubs that have spent the most during especially the 1990’s and 2000’s and this has caused both clubs to have loans and debts that still are being paid. Then you can’t say that FFP is a nice cover as both Chelsea and PSG have been punished for not applying to the rules of FFP. Perhaps these punishments haven’t been very harsh, but according to UEFA there will be less leniency for repeat offenders. Finally, if you look at the last three or four transfer sessions you will see that clubs are spending less money and that the formula of loaning players have increased. You can also see that teams like Chelsea who before used to buy every player they wanted still buy players, but not without selling and this is new and, to me, a sign that they are considering the rules of FFP.
When it comes to Chelsea and Abramovich he bought the club and spent the most money before the FFP came into effect. Chelsea also owns Stamford Bridge, have a better TV-deal (like most Premier League teams) and therefore have far higher income than Italian clubs like Inter and AC Milan.
For Manchester City the situation is almost the same. The new owner injected the money before FFP and therefore gets away with it. What they have to do right now is to make sure that their income can cover these player’s wages and that their income from player sales, tv-deal, tickets etc. is more than they spend.
biabiany is not even good for substitute! Cerci 100% better!
Totally agree with you .. we aiming champion league spot, and believe me with Biabiany type of players bringing in, CHL spot its just a dream! If we need wing player then we should go for Cerci or Lamela, Nani, not this kid !!